Authors: Patanamon Thongtanunam Shane McIntosh Ahmed E. Hassan Hajimu Iida
Venue: EMSE 2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), pp. 475-475, 2018
Year: 2018
Abstract: This paper empirically investigates the factors influence review participation in the MCR process. Through a case study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack open source projects, we find that the amount of review participation in the past is a significant indicator of patches that will suffer from poor review participation. Moreover, the description length of a patch and the purpose of introducing new features also share a relationship with the likelihood of receiving poor review participation. This paper is an extended abstract of a paper published in the Empirical Software Engineering journal. The original paper is communicated by Jeffrey C. Carver.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{patanamonthongtanunam2018rpimcraesotaqaop(a,
author = "Patanamon Thongtanunam and Shane McIntosh and Ahmed E. Hassan and Hajimu Iida",
title = "Review participation in modern code review: An empirical study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack projects (journal-first abstract)",
year = "2018",
pages = "475-475",
booktitle = "Proceedings of 2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)"
}
Plain Text:
Patanamon Thongtanunam, Shane McIntosh, Ahmed E. Hassan, and Hajimu Iida, "Review participation in modern code review: An empirical study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack projects (journal-first abstract)," 2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), pp. 475-475